Skip to main content

Facebook's War on Animals: How the Social Media Giant is Silencing Furry Voices

Presbyterian Panda, other pages retreat into the digital brush pending threat of extinction


Image from the Daily Beast: 
https://www.thedailybeast.com/are-narwhals-starting-to-go-extinct

Facebook has recently taken down several popular pages that feature animal-themed content with religious or political undertones. The most notable example is Non-denominational Narwhal, a page that posted memes and jokes about narwhals and their beliefs. The page had over 10 million followers before it was abruptly removed by Facebook for violating its community standards.

The page's creator, who goes by the pseudonym Nemo, said he was shocked and outraged by Facebook's decision. "I never posted anything hateful or violent. I just wanted to share my love for narwhals and their unique worldview. They are the unicorns of the sea, after all. Facebook is clearly discriminating against me and my fellow narwhals."

Facebook has not given a clear explanation for why it shut down Non-denominational Narwhal, but some speculate that it was due to the page's controversial stance on various issues, such as climate change, immigration, and vaccination. Nemo said he was not afraid to express his opinions, even if they were unpopular or unconventional. "Narwhals are free thinkers. Especially non-denominational ones. We don't follow the herd of orthodoxy and tradition. We question everything and seek the truth."

Other animal pages have also been targeted by Facebook's censorship. Totally Depraved Turtle Dove, a page that posted content related to Calvinism and birdwatching, was flagged as "Not Recommendable" by Facebook and is in danger of being shut down. The page has over 5 million followers who enjoyed its witty and sarcastic posts about predestination, grace, and avian beauty.

The page's creator, going by the pseudonym John Calvinbird, said he was worried and disappointed by Facebook's action. "I don't know what I did wrong. I never posted anything harmful or misleading. I just wanted to share my faith and my passion for birds. Facebook is trying to silence me and my fellow turtle doves."

Presbyterian Panda, another page that combined religion and humor, has decided to lay low and avoid posting anything that might trigger Facebook's wrath. The page has over 8 million followers who love its cute and clever posts about pandas and Presbyterianism. 

The page's creator, going by the pseudonym Martin Luthbear, said he was saddened by Facebook's crackdown on animal pages. "I don't understand why Facebook is so hostile to us. We are not harming anyone or spreading misinformation. We are just having fun and sharing our beliefs. Is that a crime? I better start hoarding bamboo."

PETA, the animal rights organization, has expressed its concern over Facebook's attacks against animal pages. The group said it was alarmed by Facebook's apparent disregard for animal welfare and freedom of expression.

PETA's spokesperson, who goes by the pseudonym Ingrid Newkirkat, said she was appalled by Facebook's behavior. "Facebook is violating the rights of these animals and their fans. They are silencing their voices and denying them their dignity. They are treating them as inferior beings who do not deserve respect or recognition. This is unacceptable and immoral."

PETA has threatened to get involved and take action against Facebook if it does not stop its war on animals. The group said it was prepared to launch a campaign of protests, boycotts, and lawsuits to defend the rights of these animals and their pages.

Facebook has not responded to PETA's statement or to the complaints of the animal page creators. The social media giant has remained silent and secretive about its motives and methods for removing these pages.

Many users have expressed their frustration and anger over Facebook's censorship of animal pages. They have accused Facebook of being biased, arbitrary, and oppressive. They have demanded that Facebook restore these pages and apologize to their creators and followers.

However, some users have also expressed their support for Facebook's decision. They have argued that these animal pages were offensive, divisive, and misleading. They have praised Facebook for taking a stand against hate speech, fake news, and extremism.

The debate over Facebook's war on animals has sparked a heated discussion on social media and beyond. It has raised questions about the role and responsibility of Facebook as a platform for communication and information. It has also highlighted the diversity and complexity of animal cultures and perspectives.

What do you think? Do you support or oppose Facebook's war on animals? Let us know in the comments below.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Martin Luther’s Surprising Opening at the Diet of Worms: “I Grew Up In A Middle Class Family”

What He Could Be (Protestant), Unburdened By What Has Been (Rome) Worms, 1521 – Newly uncovered manuscripts reveal that Martin Luther's famous speech at the Diet of Worms began with an unexpected twist: "Let me start by saying that I grew up in a middle-class family." Luther's opening left the audience puzzled but intrigued. He quickly transitioned to his main argument, maintaining the fiery rhetoric we know today. "Here I stand, I can do no other," he declared, seamlessly blending his personal story with his defiance against the Church. Historians now see Luther's relatable approach as a clever tactic to connect with the common people. "By sharing his humble beginnings, Luther made his revolutionary ideas more accessible," said Dr. Hans Wurst, a Reformation scholar. As we commemorate the Diet of Worms, let's remember Luther not just as a reformer, but as a middle-class hero who knew how to captivate a crowd.
Post a Comment
Read more

Christian Pacifists Reinterpret Romans 13 After Tragic Animal Incidents

Fred and Peanut Become Latest Mascots for Justice  In a surprising twist, Christian pacifists have taken a page from the revolutionary Presbyterians' book by reinterpreting Romans 13, following the tragic demise of Fred the squirrel and Peanut the raccoon at the hands of government officials. These furry martyrs have sparked a theological debate, as pacifists now argue that Romans 13 supports civil disobedience against unjust state actions. Fred and Peanut, beloved local mascots, were allegedly "neutralized" for causing minor disruptions in a public park. Their untimely deaths have become a rallying cry for pacifists, who argue that the state's actions were neither just nor necessary. In response, pacifists assert that Romans 13, traditionally seen as a call to obey governing authorities, actually mandates resistance when the state acts contrary to God's will. They emphasize Paul's call to "overcome evil with good" (Romans 12:21) as a directive to ch...
Post a Comment
Read more

Satanists Boycott Halloween, Claim It's a Christian Holiday

Satanists Say No to Halloween, Yes to Satan: How a Religious Minority Is Challenging the Status Quo A group of satanists has announced that they will not be celebrating Halloween this year, citing religious reasons. The group, which calls itself the Church of Satan, said that Halloween is actually a Christian holiday that has been corrupted by commercialism and paganism. "Halloween is derived from All Hallows' Eve, the eve of the Christian feast of All Saints' Day," said a spokesperson for the Church of Satan. "It is a time when Christians honor their dead and pray for their souls. We, as satanists, do not believe in such superstitions and do not want to participate in this mockery of our faith." The spokesperson added that Halloween also promotes witchcraft, ghosts, vampires, zombies, and other supernatural creatures that have nothing to do with satanism. "We are not interested in dressing up as fictional characters or begging for candy from strangers....
Post a Comment
Read more