Skip to main content

Facebook's War on Animals: How the Social Media Giant is Silencing Furry Voices

Presbyterian Panda, other pages retreat into the digital brush pending threat of extinction


Image from the Daily Beast: 
https://www.thedailybeast.com/are-narwhals-starting-to-go-extinct

Facebook has recently taken down several popular pages that feature animal-themed content with religious or political undertones. The most notable example is Non-denominational Narwhal, a page that posted memes and jokes about narwhals and their beliefs. The page had over 10 million followers before it was abruptly removed by Facebook for violating its community standards.

The page's creator, who goes by the pseudonym Nemo, said he was shocked and outraged by Facebook's decision. "I never posted anything hateful or violent. I just wanted to share my love for narwhals and their unique worldview. They are the unicorns of the sea, after all. Facebook is clearly discriminating against me and my fellow narwhals."

Facebook has not given a clear explanation for why it shut down Non-denominational Narwhal, but some speculate that it was due to the page's controversial stance on various issues, such as climate change, immigration, and vaccination. Nemo said he was not afraid to express his opinions, even if they were unpopular or unconventional. "Narwhals are free thinkers. Especially non-denominational ones. We don't follow the herd of orthodoxy and tradition. We question everything and seek the truth."

Other animal pages have also been targeted by Facebook's censorship. Totally Depraved Turtle Dove, a page that posted content related to Calvinism and birdwatching, was flagged as "Not Recommendable" by Facebook and is in danger of being shut down. The page has over 5 million followers who enjoyed its witty and sarcastic posts about predestination, grace, and avian beauty.

The page's creator, going by the pseudonym John Calvinbird, said he was worried and disappointed by Facebook's action. "I don't know what I did wrong. I never posted anything harmful or misleading. I just wanted to share my faith and my passion for birds. Facebook is trying to silence me and my fellow turtle doves."

Presbyterian Panda, another page that combined religion and humor, has decided to lay low and avoid posting anything that might trigger Facebook's wrath. The page has over 8 million followers who love its cute and clever posts about pandas and Presbyterianism. 

The page's creator, going by the pseudonym Martin Luthbear, said he was saddened by Facebook's crackdown on animal pages. "I don't understand why Facebook is so hostile to us. We are not harming anyone or spreading misinformation. We are just having fun and sharing our beliefs. Is that a crime? I better start hoarding bamboo."

PETA, the animal rights organization, has expressed its concern over Facebook's attacks against animal pages. The group said it was alarmed by Facebook's apparent disregard for animal welfare and freedom of expression.

PETA's spokesperson, who goes by the pseudonym Ingrid Newkirkat, said she was appalled by Facebook's behavior. "Facebook is violating the rights of these animals and their fans. They are silencing their voices and denying them their dignity. They are treating them as inferior beings who do not deserve respect or recognition. This is unacceptable and immoral."

PETA has threatened to get involved and take action against Facebook if it does not stop its war on animals. The group said it was prepared to launch a campaign of protests, boycotts, and lawsuits to defend the rights of these animals and their pages.

Facebook has not responded to PETA's statement or to the complaints of the animal page creators. The social media giant has remained silent and secretive about its motives and methods for removing these pages.

Many users have expressed their frustration and anger over Facebook's censorship of animal pages. They have accused Facebook of being biased, arbitrary, and oppressive. They have demanded that Facebook restore these pages and apologize to their creators and followers.

However, some users have also expressed their support for Facebook's decision. They have argued that these animal pages were offensive, divisive, and misleading. They have praised Facebook for taking a stand against hate speech, fake news, and extremism.

The debate over Facebook's war on animals has sparked a heated discussion on social media and beyond. It has raised questions about the role and responsibility of Facebook as a platform for communication and information. It has also highlighted the diversity and complexity of animal cultures and perspectives.

What do you think? Do you support or oppose Facebook's war on animals? Let us know in the comments below.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dave Ramsey Flags Reformation Heritage Books as “Spiritual Treasure, Budgetary Trap”

Financial guru says the Puritans are great, but maxing out your credit card for a 12‑volume set on covenant theology is not a “baby step.” NASHVILLE — Personal finance icon Dave Ramsey has reportedly issued a pointed caution to Christians everywhere: Reformation Heritage Books is a spiritual danger to your budget, and one careless click on “Complete Works of John Owen” could slide you straight back into the “debt spiral” he has spent decades trying to prevent. According to sources familiar with the matter, the warning came during a segment on “biblically responsible spending,” when a caller asked whether it was wise to purchase a multi‑volume set of Reformed classics on a credit card. “Look,” Ramsey reportedly replied, “I love the Puritans. I love deep theology. I do not love you going into debt for a book you will read six pages of before you fall asleep.” Ramsey’s team is said to have flagged Reformation Heritage Books not because the content is bad, but because the catalog is long, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Father Warns Children Against Skillet’s ‘Monster,’ Accidentally Explains Doctrine Of Indwelling Sin

Teenager says he understood the song better after dad’s 40-minute lecture against listening to it. OAKDALE, USA — Local Christian parents Mark and Sarah Wilkins banned Skillet’s song “Monster” from the family car this week after learning that the track’s central theme involves the believer’s struggle against sin and the old self. “I had assumed it was merely loud,” Mark Wilkins said. “But then someone told me it is about the inner battle against the sinful nature. That is far too intense for our children.” Skillet is a Christian rock band, and frontman John Cooper has recently argued that hard-rock music is not inherently demonic simply because of its genre or sound.  The Wilkinses said this was exactly the sort of distinction they preferred not to make. “Scripture may talk about putting sin to death, resisting temptation, and waging spiritual war,” Mark said. “But it does not use electric guitars, so we feel safer if those ideas are communicated only through a gentle acoustic song...
Post a Comment
Read more

Church Sound Tech Gets Doom Running On Sanctuary Soundboard

Volunteer says the game is fully contained on the mixer’s tiny touchscreen and has not affected worship, apart from the pastor’s microphone now occasionally displaying “God Mode.” CEDAR GROVE, USA — A Reformed church’s sound technician briefly became the most popular member of the media team Sunday after successfully getting the original Doom to run on the sanctuary’s digital soundboard. The game remained entirely on the console’s maintenance screen, church leaders confirmed, and no imagery or game audio was played through the sanctuary speakers. The soundboard still delivered the sermon, psalms, Scripture reading, and announcements normally—provided nobody pressed the newly labeled button marked DO NOT ENABLE GOD MODE DURING CALL TO WORSHIP. Doom, released by id Software in 1993, became both a landmark first-person shooter and a longstanding target for technical hobbyists who enjoy making it run on improbable hardware.  Digital audio mixers are also common in worship settings, whe...
Post a Comment
Read more