Skip to main content

Facebook's War on Animals: How the Social Media Giant is Silencing Furry Voices

Presbyterian Panda, other pages retreat into the digital brush pending threat of extinction


Image from the Daily Beast: 
https://www.thedailybeast.com/are-narwhals-starting-to-go-extinct

Facebook has recently taken down several popular pages that feature animal-themed content with religious or political undertones. The most notable example is Non-denominational Narwhal, a page that posted memes and jokes about narwhals and their beliefs. The page had over 10 million followers before it was abruptly removed by Facebook for violating its community standards.

The page's creator, who goes by the pseudonym Nemo, said he was shocked and outraged by Facebook's decision. "I never posted anything hateful or violent. I just wanted to share my love for narwhals and their unique worldview. They are the unicorns of the sea, after all. Facebook is clearly discriminating against me and my fellow narwhals."

Facebook has not given a clear explanation for why it shut down Non-denominational Narwhal, but some speculate that it was due to the page's controversial stance on various issues, such as climate change, immigration, and vaccination. Nemo said he was not afraid to express his opinions, even if they were unpopular or unconventional. "Narwhals are free thinkers. Especially non-denominational ones. We don't follow the herd of orthodoxy and tradition. We question everything and seek the truth."

Other animal pages have also been targeted by Facebook's censorship. Totally Depraved Turtle Dove, a page that posted content related to Calvinism and birdwatching, was flagged as "Not Recommendable" by Facebook and is in danger of being shut down. The page has over 5 million followers who enjoyed its witty and sarcastic posts about predestination, grace, and avian beauty.

The page's creator, going by the pseudonym John Calvinbird, said he was worried and disappointed by Facebook's action. "I don't know what I did wrong. I never posted anything harmful or misleading. I just wanted to share my faith and my passion for birds. Facebook is trying to silence me and my fellow turtle doves."

Presbyterian Panda, another page that combined religion and humor, has decided to lay low and avoid posting anything that might trigger Facebook's wrath. The page has over 8 million followers who love its cute and clever posts about pandas and Presbyterianism. 

The page's creator, going by the pseudonym Martin Luthbear, said he was saddened by Facebook's crackdown on animal pages. "I don't understand why Facebook is so hostile to us. We are not harming anyone or spreading misinformation. We are just having fun and sharing our beliefs. Is that a crime? I better start hoarding bamboo."

PETA, the animal rights organization, has expressed its concern over Facebook's attacks against animal pages. The group said it was alarmed by Facebook's apparent disregard for animal welfare and freedom of expression.

PETA's spokesperson, who goes by the pseudonym Ingrid Newkirkat, said she was appalled by Facebook's behavior. "Facebook is violating the rights of these animals and their fans. They are silencing their voices and denying them their dignity. They are treating them as inferior beings who do not deserve respect or recognition. This is unacceptable and immoral."

PETA has threatened to get involved and take action against Facebook if it does not stop its war on animals. The group said it was prepared to launch a campaign of protests, boycotts, and lawsuits to defend the rights of these animals and their pages.

Facebook has not responded to PETA's statement or to the complaints of the animal page creators. The social media giant has remained silent and secretive about its motives and methods for removing these pages.

Many users have expressed their frustration and anger over Facebook's censorship of animal pages. They have accused Facebook of being biased, arbitrary, and oppressive. They have demanded that Facebook restore these pages and apologize to their creators and followers.

However, some users have also expressed their support for Facebook's decision. They have argued that these animal pages were offensive, divisive, and misleading. They have praised Facebook for taking a stand against hate speech, fake news, and extremism.

The debate over Facebook's war on animals has sparked a heated discussion on social media and beyond. It has raised questions about the role and responsibility of Facebook as a platform for communication and information. It has also highlighted the diversity and complexity of animal cultures and perspectives.

What do you think? Do you support or oppose Facebook's war on animals? Let us know in the comments below.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Border Patrol Sends Steven Anderson to Armenia Over Misunderstanding

When Your Theological Flex Gets Lost in Translation Original image is Public Domain, courtesy of the United States Department of Homeland Security BORDER PATROL CHECKPOINT, AZ - In a bizarre twist of theological proportions, Pastor Steven Anderson's latest encounter with Border Patrol agents took an unexpected turn when he attempted to evangelize his way through a routine checkpoint. When asked about his citizenship, Anderson reportedly launched into an impromptu sermon, declaring, "I'm a citizen of Heaven, brother! Let me tell you about the Good News!" As the bemused agent tried to detain him, Anderson proclaimed, "You can't detain me! I'm free to believe because I'm Arminian!" The agent, mishearing the theological term, immediately sprang into action, shouting, "Armenian? We've got ourselves an illegal!" Chaos ensued as agents attempted to deport the protesting pastor to Armenia. "I said Arminian, not Armenian!" Anderson...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pastor Jane's Inappropriate Relationships Spark Cheers of 'Yaaaaasss Queen' Amidst Ecclesiastical Double Standards

Breaking the Stained-Glass Ceiling: Pastor Jane's Scandalous Path to Feminist Icon Status In a groundbreaking moment for ecclesiastical equality, Pastor Jane Doe has become a beacon of feminist empowerment after being caught in a series of inappropriate relationships with male congregants. Her actions have sparked a wave of support, with many hailing her as a "Yaaaaasss Queen" for shattering the stained-glass ceiling. While male pastors have historically faced defrocking for similar indiscretions, Pastor Jane's case has been celebrated as a triumph of modern feminism. "Why should men have all the fun?" quipped one supporter, highlighting the double standards that have long plagued religious institutions. Critics, however, point to biblical texts that traditionally restrict the role of pastor to men and suggest women should remain silent in church. Yet, Pastor Jane's followers argue that these interpretations are outdated and patriarchal. "If she can...
Post a Comment
Read more

Once Judeo-Christian Nation Watches Debate To Determine Which Immoral Reprobate Best Qualified to Lead

Nation’s Moral Compass Goes Haywire, Formally Resigns Following Debate Philadelphia - In a spectacle that could only be described as a divine comedy, the nation once hailed as a "Judeo-Christian" nation gathered to watch the presidential debate, eager to determine which immoral reprobate would best lead them forward. The candidates, both seasoned in the art of moral ambiguity, took the stage with the confidence of televangelists at a Sunday sermon.   As the candidates took the stage, the audience was treated to a spectacle reminiscent of a reality show, complete with mudslinging and moral gymnastics that would make even the most seasoned circus performer blush. One candidate, known for his "alternative facts," argued passionately that he had the best rallies in the history of political rallies, while another claimed to be “unburdened by the past” [but still current] administration’s numerous international scandals and blunders, promising that to fix everything she h...
Post a Comment
Read more