Skip to main content

Facebook's War on Animals: How the Social Media Giant is Silencing Furry Voices

Presbyterian Panda, other pages retreat into the digital brush pending threat of extinction


Image from the Daily Beast: 
https://www.thedailybeast.com/are-narwhals-starting-to-go-extinct

Facebook has recently taken down several popular pages that feature animal-themed content with religious or political undertones. The most notable example is Non-denominational Narwhal, a page that posted memes and jokes about narwhals and their beliefs. The page had over 10 million followers before it was abruptly removed by Facebook for violating its community standards.

The page's creator, who goes by the pseudonym Nemo, said he was shocked and outraged by Facebook's decision. "I never posted anything hateful or violent. I just wanted to share my love for narwhals and their unique worldview. They are the unicorns of the sea, after all. Facebook is clearly discriminating against me and my fellow narwhals."

Facebook has not given a clear explanation for why it shut down Non-denominational Narwhal, but some speculate that it was due to the page's controversial stance on various issues, such as climate change, immigration, and vaccination. Nemo said he was not afraid to express his opinions, even if they were unpopular or unconventional. "Narwhals are free thinkers. Especially non-denominational ones. We don't follow the herd of orthodoxy and tradition. We question everything and seek the truth."

Other animal pages have also been targeted by Facebook's censorship. Totally Depraved Turtle Dove, a page that posted content related to Calvinism and birdwatching, was flagged as "Not Recommendable" by Facebook and is in danger of being shut down. The page has over 5 million followers who enjoyed its witty and sarcastic posts about predestination, grace, and avian beauty.

The page's creator, going by the pseudonym John Calvinbird, said he was worried and disappointed by Facebook's action. "I don't know what I did wrong. I never posted anything harmful or misleading. I just wanted to share my faith and my passion for birds. Facebook is trying to silence me and my fellow turtle doves."

Presbyterian Panda, another page that combined religion and humor, has decided to lay low and avoid posting anything that might trigger Facebook's wrath. The page has over 8 million followers who love its cute and clever posts about pandas and Presbyterianism. 

The page's creator, going by the pseudonym Martin Luthbear, said he was saddened by Facebook's crackdown on animal pages. "I don't understand why Facebook is so hostile to us. We are not harming anyone or spreading misinformation. We are just having fun and sharing our beliefs. Is that a crime? I better start hoarding bamboo."

PETA, the animal rights organization, has expressed its concern over Facebook's attacks against animal pages. The group said it was alarmed by Facebook's apparent disregard for animal welfare and freedom of expression.

PETA's spokesperson, who goes by the pseudonym Ingrid Newkirkat, said she was appalled by Facebook's behavior. "Facebook is violating the rights of these animals and their fans. They are silencing their voices and denying them their dignity. They are treating them as inferior beings who do not deserve respect or recognition. This is unacceptable and immoral."

PETA has threatened to get involved and take action against Facebook if it does not stop its war on animals. The group said it was prepared to launch a campaign of protests, boycotts, and lawsuits to defend the rights of these animals and their pages.

Facebook has not responded to PETA's statement or to the complaints of the animal page creators. The social media giant has remained silent and secretive about its motives and methods for removing these pages.

Many users have expressed their frustration and anger over Facebook's censorship of animal pages. They have accused Facebook of being biased, arbitrary, and oppressive. They have demanded that Facebook restore these pages and apologize to their creators and followers.

However, some users have also expressed their support for Facebook's decision. They have argued that these animal pages were offensive, divisive, and misleading. They have praised Facebook for taking a stand against hate speech, fake news, and extremism.

The debate over Facebook's war on animals has sparked a heated discussion on social media and beyond. It has raised questions about the role and responsibility of Facebook as a platform for communication and information. It has also highlighted the diversity and complexity of animal cultures and perspectives.

What do you think? Do you support or oppose Facebook's war on animals? Let us know in the comments below.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Piper Rebukes Driscoll, Defends Stripper Sword-Swallower

Piper Defends Male Strippers from Driscoll, Says Faith is "Erotic to the Core" MINNEAPOLIS, MN - In a surprising turn of events, prominent evangelical leader John Piper has come out in defense of male strippers, arguing that their profession is a valid expression of Christian spirituality. The controversy began when fellow pastor Mark Driscoll condemned male strippers as "ungodly" and "a threat to the moral fabric of society." Driscoll's comments sparked outrage among some in the Christian community, including Piper, who quickly rushed to the defense of the much-maligned exotic dancers. "Mark Driscoll clearly has a very narrow and repressed view of human sexuality," Piper told reporters. "As I've said many times, the Christian faith is erotic to the core. God created us as sexual beings, and that includes the male stripper." Piper went on to cite the "Song of Songs" as biblical evidence that God delights in human sensu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Opinion: How to Win Any Theological Argument With One Simple Phrase

The Ultimate Guide to Dispensational Defense: How to Defend Your Faith and Confuse Your Critics Quickly and Efficiently Are you tired of losing arguments with your fellow Christians over eschatology, hermeneutics, or covenant theology? Do you wish you had a foolproof way to silence your opponents and prove your superior understanding of the Bible? Well, look no further than this one simple phrase: "You don't understand dispensationalism." That's right, with this magic phrase, you can win any theological debate in seconds. Here's how it works: - Step 1: Identify your opponent's position and label it as non-dispensational. It doesn't matter if they are amillennial, postmillennial, covenantal, or even dispensational themselves. Just say they are not. - Step 2: Assert that their position is based on a faulty interpretation of Scripture that ignores the literal, grammatical-historical method and the distinction between Israel and the church. - Step 3: When they...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pious Piper's Passionate Pivot: Launches O***F*** for 'Divine Desires' After 'Erotic' Jesus Revelation

Controversy Erupts as John Piper's Spiritual Sensuality Takes Center Stage on Unconventional Platform In a surprising turn of events, renowned Christian figure John Piper has reportedly ventured into uncharted territory by launching his own O***F*** [full name censored] page. This unexpected move comes hot on the heels of Piper's latest controversial statement where he likened his love for Jesus to something "erotic." Here’s the full quote: “…  that love, that love is not equal to obedience and that love is not equal to agape,  that love is erotic to the core . That’s an overstatement. Eros means I find pleasure in you, Jesus. I find pleasure in you, Jesus.” Piper's account, aptly named "DivineDesires," promises exclusive content that delves into the intimate and sensual aspects of his spiritual connection with Jesus. Subscribers to his page are treated to a series of videos where Piper engages in seemingly ordinary activities, but with a twist that sugg...
Post a Comment
Read more