Skip to main content

Posts

Apostle Paul Accused of Being a Christian Nationalist

Critics say Paul’s Roman passport, Jewish pedigree, and nonstop preaching make him “problematic” at best—and possibly one of those people who thinks Christ outranks the discourse. ROME — Social media users were once again forced into a familiar and exhausting interpretive crisis this week after realizing that the apostle Paul cannot be neatly sorted into the preferred categories of modern ideological panic. The controversy began when several commentators noticed that Paul appealed to his Roman citizenship when it helped him, identified as a Jew when relevant, and still managed to spend the rest of his life announcing that Jesus Christ—not Caesar, not tribe, and not the hot take of the moment—was Lord. This, according to online critics, is exactly the sort of thing that makes someone a Christian nationalist. “He obviously had strong views about identity, authority, and the public square,” said one observer after six consecutive posts that did not survive contact with the text. “That’s t...
Recent posts

Supreme Court Rejects Baptists' Attempt to Limit Covenant Membership

Baptists call the ruling a shocking overreach, while proponents say the Court has finally recognized that the covenant does not wait for a first coherent sentence. WASHINGTON — In a decision that immediately set off alarms in Baptist churches across the country, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that any baby born in a Baptist church is automatically considered a member of the covenant, whether or not the parents planned for it, explained it, or survive the nursery class. The ruling was hailed by advocates of covenant theology as a long-overdue acknowledgment that God’s promises do not depend on a toddler’s ability to recite a testimony or sit still through an entire sermon. “This is about the objective reality of the covenant,” said one theologian. “Apparently the Court now understands that babies do not become less included just because the adults are nervous about it.” Baptists reacted with predictable disbelief, arguing that covenant membership requires a personal profession of faith,...

Man Leaves Protestantism for Eastern Orthodoxy After Learning It Looks More Serious on Social Media

 Sources say the move was inspired less by theology than by incense, icons, and the deeply spiritual confidence that comes from joining whatever tradition currently sounds hardest to explain at dinner. NEW YORK — In a move described by friends as “predictable” and by the internet as “inevitable,” one notoriously pretentious Protestant announced this week that he had converted to Eastern Orthodoxy after discovering it had the exact aesthetic ratio of mystery, gravity, and historical gravitas required to support his personality. According to those familiar with the situation, the man’s conversion was not preceded by any serious study of polity, conciliar history, sacramental theology, or the thousand-year arguments that usually accompany a decision of this kind. Instead, sources said, he arrived at Orthodoxy the way some people arrive at artisan coffee: by noticing that it seems more authentic than what everyone else is doing and then speaking about it as though he had personally sur...

Churches Urged to Remove Bibles During Wave of Newcomers Due to Ecumenism Concerns

Church officials say the measure will help avoid offending anyone by leaving Christianity safely visible only in memory, stained glass, and a few carefully neutral statements about shared values. In a groundbreaking effort to make sure the church remains welcoming to everyone except the Bible, denominational leaders reportedly urged congregations this week to remove visible copies of Scripture during a wave of newcomers, citing concerns that overt Christianity might create “ecumenical discomfort.” The policy, praised by officials as a bold step toward unity, encourages churches to preserve the faith in all the traditional ways: by referring to it vaguely, treating it respectfully from a distance, and ensuring it does not appear in the room where actual decisions are being made. “This is really about hospitality,” said one church representative, “and by hospitality we mean removing anything that might suggest the church believes something with any clarity at all.” According to sources, ...

Worship Band Hits I Chord, Half the Congregation Mistakes It for Revival

Sources say the room experienced “a move of the Spirit,” though musicians later confirmed it was only a very effective resolution and a highly suggestible emotional arc. In a development that has once again exposed the fragile boundary between biblical worship and harmonic manipulation, several attendees at Sunday’s service reportedly concluded they had encountered the Holy Spirit after the worship band moved from the VII chord to the I chord and held the landing just long enough to make everyone feel as though something eternal had happened. Witnesses described the moment as “powerful,” “transcendent,” and “the exact part where I got goosebumps,” though one seminary-trained congregant later noted that the emotional spike seemed suspiciously tied to a chord progression and not, as advertised, to a fresh outpouring of divine glory. “The Spirit really showed up there,” said one worshipper, wiping away tears during the bridge, apparently unaware that the band had simply delayed the tonic ...

King Charles Defends Every Faith Except the One the Crown Used to Have

 Palace rebrands “Defender of the Faith” as “Defender of Faith” in a landmark move that proves Europe has finally conquered Christianity by making it officially optional LONDON — In a move hailed by officials as a triumph of pluralism and by theologians as another small administrative funeral for Christian civilization, King Charles III’s royal role has been updated to “Defender of Faith” in recognition of Britain’s multi-faith reality, a phrase so broad it now appears designed to offend no one except the truth. The revision reportedly came after palace strategists concluded that the monarchy’s original Christian title had become inconveniently particular, and that the best way to honor religious diversity was to flatten all religions into one large ceremonial category with no discernible content. “People today want representation,” said one palace source, “and what better way to represent everyone than by declaring the crown officially committed to all faiths in general, which is ...

Spielberg’s Latest “Challenge to Faith” Mostly Affirms the Faith of Those Who Already Lack It

Both Van Til and Clark Camps Agree: Starting with the Wrong Presuppositions Still Gets You Exactly Where You Planned to Go Steven Spielberg’s latest film is being marketed as a bold intellectual reckoning for Christianity. In practice, it functions more like a polished reassurance that disbelief remains as plausible as ever—provided one begins by assuming it. The film’s argument, such as it is, does not so much arrive at its conclusion as it installs it at the foundation. Divine revelation is quietly set aside, human reason is granted autonomy, and from there the narrative unfolds with a kind of cinematic inevitability. Unsurprisingly, a worldview that begins by excluding God manages, after two hours and a swelling score, to conclude that God is unnecessary. From a Van Til perspective, the film is almost commendably transparent. There is no pretense of neutrality here—only a set of presuppositions doing exactly what presuppositions do. From a Clarkian standpoint, it is equally instruct...