“Happy Mother’s Day”: A Brief Theology of Weak Dads Arnold Schwarzenegger has issued what may be the most unintentionally prophetic Father’s Day message of our time: “Your dad can’t lift? Well then happy Mother’s Day to your dad!” It’s crude. It’s excessive. It’s also uncomfortably close to 1 Corinthians 16:13: “Act like men, be strong.” Scripture does not blush at strength. David killed lions (1 Samuel 17:34–36). Samson carried city gates (Judges 16:3). Paul disciplined his body (1 Corinthians 9:27). Even Joseph—the earthly father of Jesus—was a carpenter (Matthew 13:55), which at minimum suggests he did not need to “get a second guy” to move a table. In some Roman Catholic traditions (granted, non-canonical and safely rejected at your local Reformed church), Joseph is even depicted as a kind of quiet enforcer—protecting the Christ child, scaring off threats, and generally not being the sort of man who would throw out his back reaching for a sandal. Meanwhile, the modern Christia...
Both Van Til and Clark Camps Agree: Starting with the Wrong Presuppositions Still Gets You Exactly Where You Planned to Go Steven Spielberg’s latest film is being marketed as a bold intellectual reckoning for Christianity. In practice, it functions more like a polished reassurance that disbelief remains as plausible as ever—provided one begins by assuming it. The film’s argument, such as it is, does not so much arrive at its conclusion as it installs it at the foundation. Divine revelation is quietly set aside, human reason is granted autonomy, and from there the narrative unfolds with a kind of cinematic inevitability. Unsurprisingly, a worldview that begins by excluding God manages, after two hours and a swelling score, to conclude that God is unnecessary. From a Van Til perspective, the film is almost commendably transparent. There is no pretense of neutrality here—only a set of presuppositions doing exactly what presuppositions do. From a Clarkian standpoint, it is equally instruct...