Skip to main content

The Coup de' grâce: How to Win Any Theological Argument , Part II


If you are a faithful follower of John MacArthur and/or John Nelson Darby and the  unbiblical interpretation system known as Dispensationalism, you may have encountered some opposition from those who disagree with your views. In our last article, we discussed how to refute basic critics of dispensationalism by using the nearly foolproof one-liner: "you don't understand Dispensationalism." But what if they do?

If your opponent can actually demonstrate a working knowledge of the basic concepts, knows the core theologians, and is unfazed by the hermeneutic, then it's time to up your apologetic  game. The best way to do that is with this next-level response: 

"That's not *REAL* Dispensationalism." 

Boom! The cake is a lie. Game over. Roll the credits.

Why is this phrase so effective? Because it allows you to dismiss any argument or evidence that contradicts your position without having to engage with it. It also implies that you are the sole authority on what constitutes real dispensationalism, and that anyone who disagrees with you is either ignorant or dishonest. It's a win-win situation for you.

But how do you know what is real dispensationalism and what is not? Well, that's easy! Real Dispensationalism is whatever you believe it is. Obviously. If it wasn't the bonafide real deal, then why would you believe it? If someone challenges your interpretation of a biblical passage, a historical event, or a theological doctrine, just say "that's not real Dispensationalism" and move on. Don't worry about being consistent or coherent. Just stick to your guns and assert your superiority. It’s really that simple. Look at the Socialists. They’ve been applying the same basic principle for years, and now they own the schools and government. But they don’t own us yet, so let’s get back on topic.

Here are some examples of how to use this phrase in different scenarios:

- Scenario 1: Someone points out that dispensationalism originated in the 19th century and has no historical support from the early church fathers or the reformers.

- Your response: That's not real dispensationalism. Real dispensationalism is based on the literal grammatical-historical interpretation of the Bible, which has been practiced by faithful believers since the apostolic age. The early church fathers and the reformers were influenced by allegorical and covenantal methods that distorted the plain meaning of Scripture.

- Scenario 2: Someone points out that dispensationalism divides God's people into two distinct groups: Israel and the church, and that this contradicts the biblical teaching that there is one people of God in Christ.

- Your response: That's not real dispensationalism. Real dispensationalism recognizes that God has different plans and purposes for Israel and the church, and that he deals with them differently in different dispensations. The biblical teaching that there is one people of God in Christ only applies to the church age, not to other dispensations.

- Scenario 3: Someone points out that dispensationalism teaches a pretribulational rapture of the church which is not found anywhere in Scripture.

- Your response: That's not real dispensationalism. Real dispensationalism teaches a pretribulational rapture of the church which is clearly implied by Scripture. The rapture is a mystery that was revealed to Paul and other apostles, and it is consistent with the doctrine of imminence and the distinction between Israel and the church.

As you can see, this phrase can be used to counter any objection or criticism of dispensationalism. It is a powerful tool that will make you invincible in any debate or discussion. Just remember: if someone disagrees with you, they don't understand dispensationalism. And if they think they do understand it, they don't understand REAL Dispensationalism. Either way, you win.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dave Ramsey Flags Reformation Heritage Books as “Spiritual Treasure, Budgetary Trap”

Financial guru says the Puritans are great, but maxing out your credit card for a 12‑volume set on covenant theology is not a “baby step.” NASHVILLE — Personal finance icon Dave Ramsey has reportedly issued a pointed caution to Christians everywhere: Reformation Heritage Books is a spiritual danger to your budget, and one careless click on “Complete Works of John Owen” could slide you straight back into the “debt spiral” he has spent decades trying to prevent. According to sources familiar with the matter, the warning came during a segment on “biblically responsible spending,” when a caller asked whether it was wise to purchase a multi‑volume set of Reformed classics on a credit card. “Look,” Ramsey reportedly replied, “I love the Puritans. I love deep theology. I do not love you going into debt for a book you will read six pages of before you fall asleep.” Ramsey’s team is said to have flagged Reformation Heritage Books not because the content is bad, but because the catalog is long, ...

Father Warns Children Against Skillet’s ‘Monster,’ Accidentally Explains Doctrine Of Indwelling Sin

Teenager says he understood the song better after dad’s 40-minute lecture against listening to it. OAKDALE, USA — Local Christian parents Mark and Sarah Wilkins banned Skillet’s song “Monster” from the family car this week after learning that the track’s central theme involves the believer’s struggle against sin and the old self. “I had assumed it was merely loud,” Mark Wilkins said. “But then someone told me it is about the inner battle against the sinful nature. That is far too intense for our children.” Skillet is a Christian rock band, and frontman John Cooper has recently argued that hard-rock music is not inherently demonic simply because of its genre or sound.  The Wilkinses said this was exactly the sort of distinction they preferred not to make. “Scripture may talk about putting sin to death, resisting temptation, and waging spiritual war,” Mark said. “But it does not use electric guitars, so we feel safer if those ideas are communicated only through a gentle acoustic song...

Church Sound Tech Gets Doom Running On Sanctuary Soundboard

Volunteer says the game is fully contained on the mixer’s tiny touchscreen and has not affected worship, apart from the pastor’s microphone now occasionally displaying “God Mode.” CEDAR GROVE, USA — A Reformed church’s sound technician briefly became the most popular member of the media team Sunday after successfully getting the original Doom to run on the sanctuary’s digital soundboard. The game remained entirely on the console’s maintenance screen, church leaders confirmed, and no imagery or game audio was played through the sanctuary speakers. The soundboard still delivered the sermon, psalms, Scripture reading, and announcements normally—provided nobody pressed the newly labeled button marked DO NOT ENABLE GOD MODE DURING CALL TO WORSHIP. Doom, released by id Software in 1993, became both a landmark first-person shooter and a longstanding target for technical hobbyists who enjoy making it run on improbable hardware.  Digital audio mixers are also common in worship settings, whe...