Skip to main content

Reformed Church's Nursery Extension Ruled Unconstitutional

Some Volunteers Question Whether Believers’ Children Are Really Holy



 ASHBURN, VA - A local Reformed church's decision to extend the nursery time on Sunday mornings by an hour has been overturned by the Supreme Court on the grounds of cruel and unusual punishment to the volunteer nursery attendants.

The church, Grace Covenant Presbyterian Church, had announced the new policy last month, citing the need for more time for the adult congregation to enjoy fellowship, coffee, and donuts after the worship service. The policy would have required the nursery volunteers to stay with the children, aged from six months to four years, for an additional hour, making the total nursery time three hours long.


However, the policy was met with fierce opposition from the nursery volunteers, who claimed that the extended time would subject them to unbearable levels of noise, chaos, and diaper changes. They filed a lawsuit against the church, arguing that the policy violated their constitutional rights and amounted to torture.


The case reached the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of the volunteers in a unanimous decision. The court stated that the policy was "a clear violation of the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits the infliction of cruel and unusual punishments." The court also noted that the policy was "unnecessary and excessive, as the church already provided ample opportunities for fellowship and refreshment during the regular nursery time."


The church's pastor, Rev. John Calvin, expressed his disappointment with the ruling, saying that he was "only trying to serve the best interests of the church and the glory of God." He said that he would respect the court's decision, but hoped that the volunteers would reconsider their stance and "show some grace and love to the little ones."


The nursery volunteers, on the other hand, celebrated the ruling, saying that they were "relieved and grateful" that the court recognized their plight. They said that they loved the children, but that they also needed some rest and sanity. They said that they would continue to serve the church, but only for the original two hours of nursery time.


The ruling also sparked some theological debate among the nursery volunteers, who began to question the church's stance on paedobaptism after an extra hour with what one volunteer described as "vipers in diapers." Some of them wondered if the children were really part of the covenant community, or if they were unregenerate heathens who needed to be born again before being baptized. Others suggested that the church should adopt a credo-baptism view, which only baptizes those who profess faith in Christ. One of them even joked that the church should rename itself "Grace Conditional Presbyterian Church."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Piper Rebukes Driscoll, Defends Stripper Sword-Swallower

Piper Defends Male Strippers from Driscoll, Says Faith is "Erotic to the Core" MINNEAPOLIS, MN - In a surprising turn of events, prominent evangelical leader John Piper has come out in defense of male strippers, arguing that their profession is a valid expression of Christian spirituality. The controversy began when fellow pastor Mark Driscoll condemned male strippers as "ungodly" and "a threat to the moral fabric of society." Driscoll's comments sparked outrage among some in the Christian community, including Piper, who quickly rushed to the defense of the much-maligned exotic dancers. "Mark Driscoll clearly has a very narrow and repressed view of human sexuality," Piper told reporters. "As I've said many times, the Christian faith is erotic to the core. God created us as sexual beings, and that includes the male stripper." Piper went on to cite the "Song of Songs" as biblical evidence that God delights in human sensu...

Opinion: How to Win Any Theological Argument With One Simple Phrase

The Ultimate Guide to Dispensational Defense: How to Defend Your Faith and Confuse Your Critics Quickly and Efficiently Are you tired of losing arguments with your fellow Christians over eschatology, hermeneutics, or covenant theology? Do you wish you had a foolproof way to silence your opponents and prove your superior understanding of the Bible? Well, look no further than this one simple phrase: "You don't understand dispensationalism." That's right, with this magic phrase, you can win any theological debate in seconds. Here's how it works: - Step 1: Identify your opponent's position and label it as non-dispensational. It doesn't matter if they are amillennial, postmillennial, covenantal, or even dispensational themselves. Just say they are not. - Step 2: Assert that their position is based on a faulty interpretation of Scripture that ignores the literal, grammatical-historical method and the distinction between Israel and the church. - Step 3: When they...

Pious Piper's Passionate Pivot: Launches O***F*** for 'Divine Desires' After 'Erotic' Jesus Revelation

Controversy Erupts as John Piper's Spiritual Sensuality Takes Center Stage on Unconventional Platform In a surprising turn of events, renowned Christian figure John Piper has reportedly ventured into uncharted territory by launching his own O***F*** [full name censored] page. This unexpected move comes hot on the heels of Piper's latest controversial statement where he likened his love for Jesus to something "erotic." Here’s the full quote: “…  that love, that love is not equal to obedience and that love is not equal to agape,  that love is erotic to the core . That’s an overstatement. Eros means I find pleasure in you, Jesus. I find pleasure in you, Jesus.” Piper's account, aptly named "DivineDesires," promises exclusive content that delves into the intimate and sensual aspects of his spiritual connection with Jesus. Subscribers to his page are treated to a series of videos where Piper engages in seemingly ordinary activities, but with a twist that sugg...