Skip to main content

Dilemma: How to Make the Church Less Offensive to the World Without Losing Its Identity

Being a Cool and Hip Church is Not as Easy as it Sounds



Pastor Bob is a theologically liberal pastor of a Reformed church in Detroit, Michigan. He has a vision to make his church more seeker-friendly and relevant to the culture. He believes that the church should not be too dogmatic or judgmental, but rather focus on being welcoming and loving to everyone. He says that his motto is "being welcoming over being right."

However, Pastor Bob has recently noticed some troubling signs in his church. He observes that the members of his church are becoming more and more like the world, and less and less like Christ. He sees that they are adopting the values, attitudes, and behaviors of the secular society, such as materialism, consumerism, individualism, relativism, and hedonism. He also notices that the church is losing its distinctiveness and influence in the community. He wonders why his church is more resembling a social club than a spiritual family.

Pastor Bob is confused and frustrated. He can't understand why compromising theology to make his church more seeker-friendly has resulted in these negative consequences. He wonders if he has done something wrong, or if he has misunderstood the gospel. He asks himself: "How can I make my church more like the world without losing its identity?"

Pastor Bob decides to seek advice from some of his fellow pastors. He calls up Pastor Jim, a conservative pastor of a traditional church in the same city. Pastor Jim tells him that he is not surprised by what is happening in his church. He says that Pastor Bob has compromised the truth of God's word for the sake of popularity and relevance. He says that Pastor Bob has watered down the gospel and neglected the doctrines of sin, repentance, grace, and holiness. He says that Pastor Bob has failed to preach the whole counsel of God and to equip his flock for discipleship and mission. He says that Pastor Bob has traded the power of God for the wisdom of men.

Pastor Jim advises Pastor Bob to repent of his errors and to return to the biblical model of ministry. He tells him to preach the gospel faithfully and boldly, to teach sound doctrine and biblical ethics, to practice church discipline and accountability, to cultivate a culture of prayer and worship, and to engage in evangelism and social action. He tells him that only then will his church be transformed by the power of God and become a light in the darkness.

Pastor Bob thanks Pastor Jim for his input, but he is not convinced by his arguments. He thinks that Pastor Jim is being a gatekeeper of tradition, his too rigid and narrow-minded, and that his approach is outdated and irrelevant. He thinks that Pastor Jim is missing the point of what it means to be a Christian in the 21st century. He thinks that Pastor Jim is more concerned about being right than being welcoming.

Pastor Bob decides to call another pastor, Pastor Joe, a progressive pastor of an emergent church in Austin, Texas. Pastor Joe tells him that he is impressed by what he is doing in his church. He says that Pastor Bob is on the right track of making his church more seeker-friendly and culturally relevant. He says that Pastor Bob has understood the gospel as a message of love, acceptance, and inclusion. He says that Pastor Bob has embraced the diversity and pluralism of the postmodern society.

Pastor Joe advises Pastor Bob to continue on his path of theological liberalism and cultural adaptation. He tells him to ignore the critics and naysayers who are stuck in their old-fashioned ways of thinking and doing church. He tells him to celebrate the changes that are happening in his church as signs of growth and maturity. He tells him that his church is becoming more like Jesus, who was a friend of sinners and outcasts.

Pastor Bob thanks Pastor Joe for his encouragement, but he is not satisfied by his answers. He thinks that Pastor Joe is too loose and vague, and that his approach is shallow and superficial. He thinks that Pastor Joe has distorted the gospel and neglected the demands of discipleship. He thinks that Pastor Joe is more concerned about being welcoming than being right.

Pastor Bob hangs up the phone and sighs. He feels torn between two extremes: being too conservative or being too progressive; being too right or being too welcoming; being too worldly or being too holy. He wonders if there is a middle way, a balance, a compromise.

Pastor Bob decides that the death and resurrection of Christ is too controversial and offensive to non-believers, so he decides to leave it out of his preaching order to better build relationships with people outside the church. They don’t believe it, anyway. Pastor Bob just wants to make them feel safe and welcome so he can educate and disciple them later on. But after a while, he doesn’t believe it, either.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Border Patrol Sends Steven Anderson to Armenia Over Misunderstanding

When Your Theological Flex Gets Lost in Translation Original image is Public Domain, courtesy of the United States Department of Homeland Security BORDER PATROL CHECKPOINT, AZ - In a bizarre twist of theological proportions, Pastor Steven Anderson's latest encounter with Border Patrol agents took an unexpected turn when he attempted to evangelize his way through a routine checkpoint. When asked about his citizenship, Anderson reportedly launched into an impromptu sermon, declaring, "I'm a citizen of Heaven, brother! Let me tell you about the Good News!" As the bemused agent tried to detain him, Anderson proclaimed, "You can't detain me! I'm free to believe because I'm Arminian!" The agent, mishearing the theological term, immediately sprang into action, shouting, "Armenian? We've got ourselves an illegal!" Chaos ensued as agents attempted to deport the protesting pastor to Armenia. "I said Arminian, not Armenian!" Anderson...

Pastor Jane's Inappropriate Relationships Spark Cheers of 'Yaaaaasss Queen' Amidst Ecclesiastical Double Standards

Breaking the Stained-Glass Ceiling: Pastor Jane's Scandalous Path to Feminist Icon Status In a groundbreaking moment for ecclesiastical equality, Pastor Jane Doe has become a beacon of feminist empowerment after being caught in a series of inappropriate relationships with male congregants. Her actions have sparked a wave of support, with many hailing her as a "Yaaaaasss Queen" for shattering the stained-glass ceiling. While male pastors have historically faced defrocking for similar indiscretions, Pastor Jane's case has been celebrated as a triumph of modern feminism. "Why should men have all the fun?" quipped one supporter, highlighting the double standards that have long plagued religious institutions. Critics, however, point to biblical texts that traditionally restrict the role of pastor to men and suggest women should remain silent in church. Yet, Pastor Jane's followers argue that these interpretations are outdated and patriarchal. "If she can...

Once Judeo-Christian Nation Watches Debate To Determine Which Immoral Reprobate Best Qualified to Lead

Nation’s Moral Compass Goes Haywire, Formally Resigns Following Debate Philadelphia - In a spectacle that could only be described as a divine comedy, the nation once hailed as a "Judeo-Christian" nation gathered to watch the presidential debate, eager to determine which immoral reprobate would best lead them forward. The candidates, both seasoned in the art of moral ambiguity, took the stage with the confidence of televangelists at a Sunday sermon.   As the candidates took the stage, the audience was treated to a spectacle reminiscent of a reality show, complete with mudslinging and moral gymnastics that would make even the most seasoned circus performer blush. One candidate, known for his "alternative facts," argued passionately that he had the best rallies in the history of political rallies, while another claimed to be “unburdened by the past” [but still current] administration’s numerous international scandals and blunders, promising that to fix everything she h...