Skip to main content

Dilemma: How to Make the Church Less Offensive to the World Without Losing Its Identity

Being a Cool and Hip Church is Not as Easy as it Sounds



Pastor Bob is a theologically liberal pastor of a Reformed church in Detroit, Michigan. He has a vision to make his church more seeker-friendly and relevant to the culture. He believes that the church should not be too dogmatic or judgmental, but rather focus on being welcoming and loving to everyone. He says that his motto is "being welcoming over being right."

However, Pastor Bob has recently noticed some troubling signs in his church. He observes that the members of his church are becoming more and more like the world, and less and less like Christ. He sees that they are adopting the values, attitudes, and behaviors of the secular society, such as materialism, consumerism, individualism, relativism, and hedonism. He also notices that the church is losing its distinctiveness and influence in the community. He wonders why his church is more resembling a social club than a spiritual family.

Pastor Bob is confused and frustrated. He can't understand why compromising theology to make his church more seeker-friendly has resulted in these negative consequences. He wonders if he has done something wrong, or if he has misunderstood the gospel. He asks himself: "How can I make my church more like the world without losing its identity?"

Pastor Bob decides to seek advice from some of his fellow pastors. He calls up Pastor Jim, a conservative pastor of a traditional church in the same city. Pastor Jim tells him that he is not surprised by what is happening in his church. He says that Pastor Bob has compromised the truth of God's word for the sake of popularity and relevance. He says that Pastor Bob has watered down the gospel and neglected the doctrines of sin, repentance, grace, and holiness. He says that Pastor Bob has failed to preach the whole counsel of God and to equip his flock for discipleship and mission. He says that Pastor Bob has traded the power of God for the wisdom of men.

Pastor Jim advises Pastor Bob to repent of his errors and to return to the biblical model of ministry. He tells him to preach the gospel faithfully and boldly, to teach sound doctrine and biblical ethics, to practice church discipline and accountability, to cultivate a culture of prayer and worship, and to engage in evangelism and social action. He tells him that only then will his church be transformed by the power of God and become a light in the darkness.

Pastor Bob thanks Pastor Jim for his input, but he is not convinced by his arguments. He thinks that Pastor Jim is being a gatekeeper of tradition, his too rigid and narrow-minded, and that his approach is outdated and irrelevant. He thinks that Pastor Jim is missing the point of what it means to be a Christian in the 21st century. He thinks that Pastor Jim is more concerned about being right than being welcoming.

Pastor Bob decides to call another pastor, Pastor Joe, a progressive pastor of an emergent church in Austin, Texas. Pastor Joe tells him that he is impressed by what he is doing in his church. He says that Pastor Bob is on the right track of making his church more seeker-friendly and culturally relevant. He says that Pastor Bob has understood the gospel as a message of love, acceptance, and inclusion. He says that Pastor Bob has embraced the diversity and pluralism of the postmodern society.

Pastor Joe advises Pastor Bob to continue on his path of theological liberalism and cultural adaptation. He tells him to ignore the critics and naysayers who are stuck in their old-fashioned ways of thinking and doing church. He tells him to celebrate the changes that are happening in his church as signs of growth and maturity. He tells him that his church is becoming more like Jesus, who was a friend of sinners and outcasts.

Pastor Bob thanks Pastor Joe for his encouragement, but he is not satisfied by his answers. He thinks that Pastor Joe is too loose and vague, and that his approach is shallow and superficial. He thinks that Pastor Joe has distorted the gospel and neglected the demands of discipleship. He thinks that Pastor Joe is more concerned about being welcoming than being right.

Pastor Bob hangs up the phone and sighs. He feels torn between two extremes: being too conservative or being too progressive; being too right or being too welcoming; being too worldly or being too holy. He wonders if there is a middle way, a balance, a compromise.

Pastor Bob decides that the death and resurrection of Christ is too controversial and offensive to non-believers, so he decides to leave it out of his preaching order to better build relationships with people outside the church. They don’t believe it, anyway. Pastor Bob just wants to make them feel safe and welcome so he can educate and disciple them later on. But after a while, he doesn’t believe it, either.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Piper Rebukes Driscoll, Defends Stripper Sword-Swallower

Piper Defends Male Strippers from Driscoll, Says Faith is "Erotic to the Core" MINNEAPOLIS, MN - In a surprising turn of events, prominent evangelical leader John Piper has come out in defense of male strippers, arguing that their profession is a valid expression of Christian spirituality. The controversy began when fellow pastor Mark Driscoll condemned male strippers as "ungodly" and "a threat to the moral fabric of society." Driscoll's comments sparked outrage among some in the Christian community, including Piper, who quickly rushed to the defense of the much-maligned exotic dancers. "Mark Driscoll clearly has a very narrow and repressed view of human sexuality," Piper told reporters. "As I've said many times, the Christian faith is erotic to the core. God created us as sexual beings, and that includes the male stripper." Piper went on to cite the "Song of Songs" as biblical evidence that God delights in human sensu...

Opinion: How to Win Any Theological Argument With One Simple Phrase

The Ultimate Guide to Dispensational Defense: How to Defend Your Faith and Confuse Your Critics Quickly and Efficiently Are you tired of losing arguments with your fellow Christians over eschatology, hermeneutics, or covenant theology? Do you wish you had a foolproof way to silence your opponents and prove your superior understanding of the Bible? Well, look no further than this one simple phrase: "You don't understand dispensationalism." That's right, with this magic phrase, you can win any theological debate in seconds. Here's how it works: - Step 1: Identify your opponent's position and label it as non-dispensational. It doesn't matter if they are amillennial, postmillennial, covenantal, or even dispensational themselves. Just say they are not. - Step 2: Assert that their position is based on a faulty interpretation of Scripture that ignores the literal, grammatical-historical method and the distinction between Israel and the church. - Step 3: When they...

Pious Piper's Passionate Pivot: Launches O***F*** for 'Divine Desires' After 'Erotic' Jesus Revelation

Controversy Erupts as John Piper's Spiritual Sensuality Takes Center Stage on Unconventional Platform In a surprising turn of events, renowned Christian figure John Piper has reportedly ventured into uncharted territory by launching his own O***F*** [full name censored] page. This unexpected move comes hot on the heels of Piper's latest controversial statement where he likened his love for Jesus to something "erotic." Here’s the full quote: “…  that love, that love is not equal to obedience and that love is not equal to agape,  that love is erotic to the core . That’s an overstatement. Eros means I find pleasure in you, Jesus. I find pleasure in you, Jesus.” Piper's account, aptly named "DivineDesires," promises exclusive content that delves into the intimate and sensual aspects of his spiritual connection with Jesus. Subscribers to his page are treated to a series of videos where Piper engages in seemingly ordinary activities, but with a twist that sugg...