Skip to main content

Free-Will Theist Stumps Calvinist With John 3:16

Stunned Calvinist Left With No Comeback After Hearing Surprising Verse




GRAND RAPIDS, MI - In a stunning turn of events at the annual Tulip Festival Theological Debate, local provisionist Hank Vreeken claims to have utterly stumped his Calvinist opponent by quoting the famous verse John 3:16.


"I could see the color just drain from his face," said Vreeken, a retired plumber. "He had no comeback at all. It was like I hit him with a theological nuclear bomb."


The verse in question, which reads "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life," has long been considered a silver bullet against the Calvinist doctrine of limited atonement. However, most Calvinists are well-versed in responding to the argument.*


Not Herman Van Slooten, Vreeken's opponent. "I've been a Calvinist my whole life, and I'd never actually read that verse before," admitted a visibly shaken Van Slooten. "My Bible just goes from John 3:15 straight to John 3:17. The pages were stuck together or something."


Van Slooten, a retired curmudgeon, claims he has spent decades studying the Bible but primarily stuck to reading the Book of Romans over and over, especially the 9th chapter which he had practically memorized. "I'd skim the other books now and then, but I always thought John was just about the incarnation and a bunch of 'I am' statements. Had no idea there were bombs like that in there!"


When asked why he didn't simply respond that the verse does not negate the Calvinist understanding of the extent and efficacy of the atonement, Van Slooten admitted "I just panicked. All Calvinists know you're supposed to just yell 'ROMANS 9!' really loud anytime someone brings up a troubling verse. But my mind went blank."


The debate's moderator eventually had to call a recess and bring Van Slooten a paper bag to breathe into after he started hyperventilating. Vreeken was declared the winner by acclamation.


"I can't believe I wasted 70 years of my life being a Calvinist," a despondent Van Slooten said as he left the stage to a standing ovation from the predominantly Arminian crowd. "If verses like that are allowed, I don't know what I believe anymore."


When reached for comment, prominent Calvinist theologian John Piper expressed dismay at the incident: "Oh man, we've got to get that verse removed from the Bible. It's going to undo 500 years of work if our guys aren't more careful."


*A Calvinist would interpret John 3:16 through the lens of God's sovereign election and limited atonement. Here is how they would understand it:


The phrase "God so loved the world" does not mean God loves every individual person equally. Rather, the "world" refers to people from all nations and backgrounds who make up the elect. God's love is particular and directed towards those He has chosen for salvation from before the foundation of the world (Eph 1:4-5). 


The words "whosoever believes" (also interpreted from the Greek as “all the believing ones”) do not imply that salvation is a possibility for all people if they choose to believe. Instead, it means that all those whom God has elected to salvation will certainly believe, as God irresistibly draws them to faith (John 6:44). Belief is the result of God's effectual calling, not the cause of salvation.


So for Calvinists, John 3:16 is not an offer of salvation to all people if they believe. It is a promise that God will certainly save all those whom He has chosen and given to the Son (John 6:37), by granting them faith to believe. The atonement was intended for and accomplished salvation for the elect alone, not the entire world (John 10:11,15).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Christian Pacifists Reinterpret Romans 13 After Tragic Animal Incidents

Fred and Peanut Become Latest Mascots for Justice  In a surprising twist, Christian pacifists have taken a page from the revolutionary Presbyterians' book by reinterpreting Romans 13, following the tragic demise of Fred the squirrel and Peanut the raccoon at the hands of government officials. These furry martyrs have sparked a theological debate, as pacifists now argue that Romans 13 supports civil disobedience against unjust state actions. Fred and Peanut, beloved local mascots, were allegedly "neutralized" for causing minor disruptions in a public park. Their untimely deaths have become a rallying cry for pacifists, who argue that the state's actions were neither just nor necessary. In response, pacifists assert that Romans 13, traditionally seen as a call to obey governing authorities, actually mandates resistance when the state acts contrary to God's will. They emphasize Paul's call to "overcome evil with good" (Romans 12:21) as a directive to ch...

Cracker Barrel Celebrates Pride with Drag Brunch and Bud Light

Cracker Barrel's Business Booms Despite Conservative Boycotts Thanks to Drag Queen Brunch and Bud Light Image source: Cracker Barrel's Official Facebook Page Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, the popular Southern-themed restaurant chain, has seen a surge in business despite facing boycotts from conservative groups for its support of Pride Month. The reason? A new menu item that has attracted customers from all walks of life: the drag queen brunch. The drag queen brunch, which is offered every Sunday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., features a variety of dishes such as rainbow pancakes, glitter grits, and fabulous french toast. But the main attraction is the live entertainment provided by some of the most talented drag queens in the country, who perform songs, dances, and comedy routines while interacting with the guests. "We wanted to do something fun and different to celebrate Pride Month and show our support for the LGBTQ+ community," said Cracker Barrel CEO Sandra Cochran. ...

Men Named "David" More Likely to Suffer Identity Crisis

Matt Chandler, the lead pastor of Southern Village Church in Flower Mound, Texas, has shot to the evangelical spotlight in after preaching a sermon in which he proclaims that "You're not David!" to an unsuspecting captive audience. In doing so, however, he inadvertently caused a mass identity crisis among an unlikely, oddly-specific demographic: people who actually are named "David." One person, who commented on the condition of anonymity, said: "I've been called David my whole life. Now that I've been told I'm not David, I don't even know who I am anymore. I've started going by my middle name, but nobody's ever called me "Matthew" before and it's really taking some getting used to. My children look at me like I'm a stranger. My wife says she feels like she's sleeping with another man. I feel like a stranger in my own skin. I'm having an identity crisis. What do I do? We reached out to a local counselor for ...