Skip to main content

Free-Will Theist Stumps Calvinist With John 3:16

Stunned Calvinist Left With No Comeback After Hearing Surprising Verse




GRAND RAPIDS, MI - In a stunning turn of events at the annual Tulip Festival Theological Debate, local provisionist Hank Vreeken claims to have utterly stumped his Calvinist opponent by quoting the famous verse John 3:16.


"I could see the color just drain from his face," said Vreeken, a retired plumber. "He had no comeback at all. It was like I hit him with a theological nuclear bomb."


The verse in question, which reads "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life," has long been considered a silver bullet against the Calvinist doctrine of limited atonement. However, most Calvinists are well-versed in responding to the argument.*


Not Herman Van Slooten, Vreeken's opponent. "I've been a Calvinist my whole life, and I'd never actually read that verse before," admitted a visibly shaken Van Slooten. "My Bible just goes from John 3:15 straight to John 3:17. The pages were stuck together or something."


Van Slooten, a retired curmudgeon, claims he has spent decades studying the Bible but primarily stuck to reading the Book of Romans over and over, especially the 9th chapter which he had practically memorized. "I'd skim the other books now and then, but I always thought John was just about the incarnation and a bunch of 'I am' statements. Had no idea there were bombs like that in there!"


When asked why he didn't simply respond that the verse does not negate the Calvinist understanding of the extent and efficacy of the atonement, Van Slooten admitted "I just panicked. All Calvinists know you're supposed to just yell 'ROMANS 9!' really loud anytime someone brings up a troubling verse. But my mind went blank."


The debate's moderator eventually had to call a recess and bring Van Slooten a paper bag to breathe into after he started hyperventilating. Vreeken was declared the winner by acclamation.


"I can't believe I wasted 70 years of my life being a Calvinist," a despondent Van Slooten said as he left the stage to a standing ovation from the predominantly Arminian crowd. "If verses like that are allowed, I don't know what I believe anymore."


When reached for comment, prominent Calvinist theologian John Piper expressed dismay at the incident: "Oh man, we've got to get that verse removed from the Bible. It's going to undo 500 years of work if our guys aren't more careful."


*A Calvinist would interpret John 3:16 through the lens of God's sovereign election and limited atonement. Here is how they would understand it:


The phrase "God so loved the world" does not mean God loves every individual person equally. Rather, the "world" refers to people from all nations and backgrounds who make up the elect. God's love is particular and directed towards those He has chosen for salvation from before the foundation of the world (Eph 1:4-5). 


The words "whosoever believes" (also interpreted from the Greek as “all the believing ones”) do not imply that salvation is a possibility for all people if they choose to believe. Instead, it means that all those whom God has elected to salvation will certainly believe, as God irresistibly draws them to faith (John 6:44). Belief is the result of God's effectual calling, not the cause of salvation.


So for Calvinists, John 3:16 is not an offer of salvation to all people if they believe. It is a promise that God will certainly save all those whom He has chosen and given to the Son (John 6:37), by granting them faith to believe. The atonement was intended for and accomplished salvation for the elect alone, not the entire world (John 10:11,15).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Border Patrol Sends Steven Anderson to Armenia Over Misunderstanding

When Your Theological Flex Gets Lost in Translation Original image is Public Domain, courtesy of the United States Department of Homeland Security BORDER PATROL CHECKPOINT, AZ - In a bizarre twist of theological proportions, Pastor Steven Anderson's latest encounter with Border Patrol agents took an unexpected turn when he attempted to evangelize his way through a routine checkpoint. When asked about his citizenship, Anderson reportedly launched into an impromptu sermon, declaring, "I'm a citizen of Heaven, brother! Let me tell you about the Good News!" As the bemused agent tried to detain him, Anderson proclaimed, "You can't detain me! I'm free to believe because I'm Arminian!" The agent, mishearing the theological term, immediately sprang into action, shouting, "Armenian? We've got ourselves an illegal!" Chaos ensued as agents attempted to deport the protesting pastor to Armenia. "I said Arminian, not Armenian!" Anderson...

Pastor Jane's Inappropriate Relationships Spark Cheers of 'Yaaaaasss Queen' Amidst Ecclesiastical Double Standards

Breaking the Stained-Glass Ceiling: Pastor Jane's Scandalous Path to Feminist Icon Status In a groundbreaking moment for ecclesiastical equality, Pastor Jane Doe has become a beacon of feminist empowerment after being caught in a series of inappropriate relationships with male congregants. Her actions have sparked a wave of support, with many hailing her as a "Yaaaaasss Queen" for shattering the stained-glass ceiling. While male pastors have historically faced defrocking for similar indiscretions, Pastor Jane's case has been celebrated as a triumph of modern feminism. "Why should men have all the fun?" quipped one supporter, highlighting the double standards that have long plagued religious institutions. Critics, however, point to biblical texts that traditionally restrict the role of pastor to men and suggest women should remain silent in church. Yet, Pastor Jane's followers argue that these interpretations are outdated and patriarchal. "If she can...

Once Judeo-Christian Nation Watches Debate To Determine Which Immoral Reprobate Best Qualified to Lead

Nation’s Moral Compass Goes Haywire, Formally Resigns Following Debate Philadelphia - In a spectacle that could only be described as a divine comedy, the nation once hailed as a "Judeo-Christian" nation gathered to watch the presidential debate, eager to determine which immoral reprobate would best lead them forward. The candidates, both seasoned in the art of moral ambiguity, took the stage with the confidence of televangelists at a Sunday sermon.   As the candidates took the stage, the audience was treated to a spectacle reminiscent of a reality show, complete with mudslinging and moral gymnastics that would make even the most seasoned circus performer blush. One candidate, known for his "alternative facts," argued passionately that he had the best rallies in the history of political rallies, while another claimed to be “unburdened by the past” [but still current] administration’s numerous international scandals and blunders, promising that to fix everything she h...