LBCF Identifies as Reformed, Claims Controversial Victory Against WCF

1689 LBCF Faces 1647 WCF in Controversial Reformed Bout

In a shocking turn of events at the 2024 Theological Olympics, the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith (LBCF) has claimed a controversial victory over the 1647 Westminster Confession of Faith (WCF) in the hotly contested "Reformed Heavyweight" division. Spectators were left bewildered as the LBCF, despite its questionable Reformed credentials, managed to secure the win not through theological prowess, but through sheer popularity.

The LBCF, representing the Baptist corner, entered the theological arena with a swagger that belied its historically precarious position in Reformed circles. Its opponent, the venerable WCF, stood firm with centuries of Reformed tradition behind it. As the bell rang, onlookers expected a fierce debate on covenant theology and sacraments. Instead, they witnessed a surprising shift in judging criteria.

The LBCF's victory, it turns out, was largely due to the overwhelming presence of Baptist believers in modern Western society. "It's like watching a popularity contest disguised as a theological debate," remarked one confused Reformed scholar in the audience.

Despite protests from the WCF's corner about the LBCF's departure from traditional Reformed positions, particularly on baptism and church governance, the judges - an independent, non-denominational council - seemed swayed by the LBCF's widespread appeal among contemporary Christians.

As the LBCF celebrated its win, mutters of "not really Reformed" could be heard from the traditionalist crowd. The WCF's team has filed a formal complaint, arguing that popularity shouldn't trump theological consistency in a Reformed competition.

Adding to the controversy, Baptist representatives insist they're different from the Anabaptists banned by earlier Reformed councils. "We're not those guys," claimed one Baptist theologian, "We just happen to agree with them on baptism... and church structure... and a few other things."

The independent council defending their decision stated, "While the WCF may have more Reformed street cred, the LBCF has more followers on social media. In today's world, that's what really counts."

This unexpected outcome has sent shockwaves through the Reformed community, with many questioning the validity of a "Reformed" title won through popular appeal rather than theological alignment. As one Puritan-costume-wearing spectator put it, "I fear Calvin is rolling in his grave, and not just because he's uncomfortable with the idea of saints' relics."

Comments

Piper Rebukes Driscoll, Defends Stripper Sword-Swallower

Piper Defends Male Strippers from Driscoll, Says Faith is "Erotic to the Core" MINNEAPOLIS, MN - In a surprising turn of events, prominent evangelical leader John Piper has come out in defense of male strippers, arguing that their profession is a valid expression of Christian spirituality. The controversy began when fellow pastor Mark Driscoll condemned male strippers as "ungodly" and "a threat to the moral fabric of society." Driscoll's comments sparked outrage among some in the Christian community, including Piper, who quickly rushed to the defense of the much-maligned exotic dancers. "Mark Driscoll clearly has a very narrow and repressed view of human sexuality," Piper told reporters. "As I've said many times, the Christian faith is erotic to the core. God created us as sexual beings, and that includes the male stripper." Piper went on to cite the "Song of Songs" as biblical evidence that God delights in human sensu

Opinion: How to Win Any Theological Argument With One Simple Phrase

The Ultimate Guide to Dispensational Defense: How to Defend Your Faith and Confuse Your Critics Quickly and Efficiently Are you tired of losing arguments with your fellow Christians over eschatology, hermeneutics, or covenant theology? Do you wish you had a foolproof way to silence your opponents and prove your superior understanding of the Bible? Well, look no further than this one simple phrase: "You don't understand dispensationalism." That's right, with this magic phrase, you can win any theological debate in seconds. Here's how it works: - Step 1: Identify your opponent's position and label it as non-dispensational. It doesn't matter if they are amillennial, postmillennial, covenantal, or even dispensational themselves. Just say they are not. - Step 2: Assert that their position is based on a faulty interpretation of Scripture that ignores the literal, grammatical-historical method and the distinction between Israel and the church. - Step 3: When they

Christian Man Denounces All Holidays as Pagan, Celebrates Nothing

Even the Calendar Comes From Pagans, Man Declares A Christian man from San Diego, California, has declared that he will not celebrate any holiday, not even his own birthday, because they are all pagan and sinful. John Bradfield, 45, says he has been studying the Bible and history for years and has come to the conclusion that every holiday is an abomination in the eyes of God. "I don't celebrate Christmas, Easter, Halloween, Thanksgiving, Valentine's Day, or any other holiday," Bradfield said. "They are all based on pagan traditions and rituals that have nothing to do with Christianity. They are all corrupted by Satan and his minions. Even my birthday is pagan, because it's based on the solar calendar, which was invented by pagans. I only follow the biblical calendar, which is based on the lunar cycles." Bradfield says he spends his days reading the Bible, praying, and preaching to others about the evils of holidays. He says he has no friends or family,

The Calvinist Chronicle

Search This Blog