Skip to main content

Servetus Didn't Kill Himself




A shocking new report by a team of independent researchers has cast doubt on the official narrative of the death of Michael Servetus, the Spanish theologian and physician who was burned at the stake for heresy by Calvinists in Geneva in 1553.


The report, titled "The Servetus Conspiracy: How the Reformed Church Covered Up a Murder", claims to have uncovered new evidence that Servetus was actually killed by a hired assassin before his execution, and that his body was swapped with a look-alike to deceive the public.


The report cites several sources, including eyewitness accounts, forensic analysis, and historical documents, to support its theory. Some of the key findings are:


- Servetus was not present at his trial, but was represented by a lawyer who was secretly working for John Calvin, the leader of the Reformed Church in Geneva.

- Servetus was held in a secret location, where he was tortured and poisoned by a professional killer hired by Calvin's allies.

- The body that was burned at the stake was not Servetus, but a homeless man who resembled him. The body was dressed in Servetus' clothes and had his writings attached to it.

- The real Servetus' body was buried in an unmarked grave outside Geneva, where it remained hidden for centuries until it was accidentally discovered by a construction worker in 2019.


The report concludes that Servetus was the victim of a political conspiracy orchestrated by Calvin and his followers, who wanted to silence him for his radical views on the Trinity, baptism, prophecy, and other doctrines. The report also accuses the Reformed Church of suppressing the truth and falsifying history for its own benefit.


The report has sparked controversy and outrage among Christians of different denominations. Some have hailed it as a groundbreaking revelation that vindicates Servetus and exposes the corruption and cruelty of Calvinism. Others have dismissed it as a baseless conspiracy theory that slanders one of the greatest reformers and theologians of all time.


The Reformed Church has issued a statement denying the allegations and calling the report "a work of fiction and slander". The statement says that the report is based on "fabricated evidence, distorted facts, and biased interpretations" and that it "aims to undermine the credibility and authority of the Reformed faith". The statement also reaffirms the church's position that Servetus was "a dangerous heretic who deserved to die for his blasphemies".


The authors of the report have defended their work and challenged the Reformed Church to provide evidence to refute their claims. They have also called for a new investigation into the death of Servetus and a public apology from the church.


The debate over Servetus' death is likely to continue for a long time, as both sides claim to have the truth on their side. What do you think? Was Servetus killed by Calvin or did he die at the stake? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Piper Rebukes Driscoll, Defends Stripper Sword-Swallower

Piper Defends Male Strippers from Driscoll, Says Faith is "Erotic to the Core" MINNEAPOLIS, MN - In a surprising turn of events, prominent evangelical leader John Piper has come out in defense of male strippers, arguing that their profession is a valid expression of Christian spirituality. The controversy began when fellow pastor Mark Driscoll condemned male strippers as "ungodly" and "a threat to the moral fabric of society." Driscoll's comments sparked outrage among some in the Christian community, including Piper, who quickly rushed to the defense of the much-maligned exotic dancers. "Mark Driscoll clearly has a very narrow and repressed view of human sexuality," Piper told reporters. "As I've said many times, the Christian faith is erotic to the core. God created us as sexual beings, and that includes the male stripper." Piper went on to cite the "Song of Songs" as biblical evidence that God delights in human sensu

Opinion: How to Win Any Theological Argument With One Simple Phrase

The Ultimate Guide to Dispensational Defense: How to Defend Your Faith and Confuse Your Critics Quickly and Efficiently Are you tired of losing arguments with your fellow Christians over eschatology, hermeneutics, or covenant theology? Do you wish you had a foolproof way to silence your opponents and prove your superior understanding of the Bible? Well, look no further than this one simple phrase: "You don't understand dispensationalism." That's right, with this magic phrase, you can win any theological debate in seconds. Here's how it works: - Step 1: Identify your opponent's position and label it as non-dispensational. It doesn't matter if they are amillennial, postmillennial, covenantal, or even dispensational themselves. Just say they are not. - Step 2: Assert that their position is based on a faulty interpretation of Scripture that ignores the literal, grammatical-historical method and the distinction between Israel and the church. - Step 3: When they

Christian Man Denounces All Holidays as Pagan, Celebrates Nothing

Even the Calendar Comes From Pagans, Man Declares A Christian man from San Diego, California, has declared that he will not celebrate any holiday, not even his own birthday, because they are all pagan and sinful. John Bradfield, 45, says he has been studying the Bible and history for years and has come to the conclusion that every holiday is an abomination in the eyes of God. "I don't celebrate Christmas, Easter, Halloween, Thanksgiving, Valentine's Day, or any other holiday,"  Bradfield  said. "They are all based on pagan traditions and rituals that have nothing to do with Christianity. They are all corrupted by Satan and his minions. Even my birthday is pagan, because it's based on the solar calendar, which was invented by pagans. I only follow the biblical calendar, which is based on the lunar cycles." Bradfield says he spends his days reading the Bible, praying, and preaching to others about the evils of holidays. He says he has no friends or family,