Skip to main content

The Great Fallacy Showdown: Flowers vs White

How to Win Friends and Influence People with Fallacies: A Masterclass by Flowers and White


Image graciously lent to us by Facebook page: 
@Free Will Ferret


In a highly anticipated debate, two prominent theologians clashed over the interpretation of John 6:44, a biblical verse that deals with God’s sovereignty and election. Leighton Flowers, a non-Calvinist, and James White, a Calvinist, each tried to prove their point of view using various logical fallacies and rhetorical devices. The result was a draw, with each side claiming absolute victory and accusing the other of being irrational and dishonest.

The debate, which was moderated by a confused and frustrated pastor, lasted for two hours and consisted of opening statements, cross-examinations, rebuttals, and closing remarks. The audience, which was divided into two camps, cheered and booed accordingly, often interrupting the speakers with shouts of “Amen!” or “Heresy!”

Flowers, who argued that God draws all people to himself and gives them the free will to accept or reject his grace, employed several fallacies and devices, such as:

  • Cherry picking: He selectively quoted from various biblical passages and historical sources that supported his view, while ignoring or dismissing those that contradicted it.
  • Straw man: He misrepresented White’s position as fatalistic and deterministic, implying that he believed that God created some people for hell and that human choices and actions were meaningless.
  • Ad populum: He appealed to the popular opinion and sentiment of the majority of Christians, who he claimed agreed with his interpretation of John 6:44 and rejected Calvinism as a false doctrine.
  • Red herring: He changed the topic several times to avoid addressing White’s arguments, bringing up irrelevant issues such as the origin of Calvinism, the problem of evil, and the nature of love.

White, who argued that God unconditionally elects some individuals for salvation and others for reprobation before they are born, and that he irresistibly draws them to himself, also used various fallacies and devices, such as:

  • Generalization: He made sweeping statements and conclusions based on insufficient or questionable evidence, such as claiming that all non-Calvinists were inconsistent, illogical, and unbiblical.
  • Ad hominem: He attacked Flowers personally, rather than his arguments, accusing him of being ignorant, arrogant, and deceptive, and questioning his credentials and motives.
  • Rhetorical device: He used rhetorical questions, analogies, and metaphors to illustrate and emphasize his points, often using emotional language and imagery to appeal to the audience’s feelings and imagination.
  • Begging the question: He assumed the truth of his own position without providing adequate support or justification, often citing his own books and articles as authoritative sources.

The debate ended with no clear winner, as both sides failed to address the main issue and resorted to fallacious and rhetorical tactics. Each side declared themselves the victor and the defender of the truth, while denouncing the other as the loser and the enemy of the gospel. The moderator thanked them for their participation and announced that the next debate would be on the topic of predestination and free will, hoping that it would be more productive and civil. The audience left the venue, either satisfied or disappointed, depending on their prior beliefs and preferences.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Martin Luther’s Surprising Opening at the Diet of Worms: “I Grew Up In A Middle Class Family”

What He Could Be (Protestant), Unburdened By What Has Been (Rome) Worms, 1521 – Newly uncovered manuscripts reveal that Martin Luther's famous speech at the Diet of Worms began with an unexpected twist: "Let me start by saying that I grew up in a middle-class family." Luther's opening left the audience puzzled but intrigued. He quickly transitioned to his main argument, maintaining the fiery rhetoric we know today. "Here I stand, I can do no other," he declared, seamlessly blending his personal story with his defiance against the Church. Historians now see Luther's relatable approach as a clever tactic to connect with the common people. "By sharing his humble beginnings, Luther made his revolutionary ideas more accessible," said Dr. Hans Wurst, a Reformation scholar. As we commemorate the Diet of Worms, let's remember Luther not just as a reformer, but as a middle-class hero who knew how to captivate a crowd.
Post a Comment
Read more

Christian Pacifists Reinterpret Romans 13 After Tragic Animal Incidents

Fred and Peanut Become Latest Mascots for Justice  In a surprising twist, Christian pacifists have taken a page from the revolutionary Presbyterians' book by reinterpreting Romans 13, following the tragic demise of Fred the squirrel and Peanut the raccoon at the hands of government officials. These furry martyrs have sparked a theological debate, as pacifists now argue that Romans 13 supports civil disobedience against unjust state actions. Fred and Peanut, beloved local mascots, were allegedly "neutralized" for causing minor disruptions in a public park. Their untimely deaths have become a rallying cry for pacifists, who argue that the state's actions were neither just nor necessary. In response, pacifists assert that Romans 13, traditionally seen as a call to obey governing authorities, actually mandates resistance when the state acts contrary to God's will. They emphasize Paul's call to "overcome evil with good" (Romans 12:21) as a directive to ch...
Post a Comment
Read more

Satanists Boycott Halloween, Claim It's a Christian Holiday

Satanists Say No to Halloween, Yes to Satan: How a Religious Minority Is Challenging the Status Quo A group of satanists has announced that they will not be celebrating Halloween this year, citing religious reasons. The group, which calls itself the Church of Satan, said that Halloween is actually a Christian holiday that has been corrupted by commercialism and paganism. "Halloween is derived from All Hallows' Eve, the eve of the Christian feast of All Saints' Day," said a spokesperson for the Church of Satan. "It is a time when Christians honor their dead and pray for their souls. We, as satanists, do not believe in such superstitions and do not want to participate in this mockery of our faith." The spokesperson added that Halloween also promotes witchcraft, ghosts, vampires, zombies, and other supernatural creatures that have nothing to do with satanism. "We are not interested in dressing up as fictional characters or begging for candy from strangers....
Post a Comment
Read more