Skip to main content

The Great Fallacy Showdown: Flowers vs White

How to Win Friends and Influence People with Fallacies: A Masterclass by Flowers and White


Image graciously lent to us by Facebook page: 
@Free Will Ferret


In a highly anticipated debate, two prominent theologians clashed over the interpretation of John 6:44, a biblical verse that deals with God’s sovereignty and election. Leighton Flowers, a non-Calvinist, and James White, a Calvinist, each tried to prove their point of view using various logical fallacies and rhetorical devices. The result was a draw, with each side claiming absolute victory and accusing the other of being irrational and dishonest.

The debate, which was moderated by a confused and frustrated pastor, lasted for two hours and consisted of opening statements, cross-examinations, rebuttals, and closing remarks. The audience, which was divided into two camps, cheered and booed accordingly, often interrupting the speakers with shouts of “Amen!” or “Heresy!”

Flowers, who argued that God draws all people to himself and gives them the free will to accept or reject his grace, employed several fallacies and devices, such as:

  • Cherry picking: He selectively quoted from various biblical passages and historical sources that supported his view, while ignoring or dismissing those that contradicted it.
  • Straw man: He misrepresented White’s position as fatalistic and deterministic, implying that he believed that God created some people for hell and that human choices and actions were meaningless.
  • Ad populum: He appealed to the popular opinion and sentiment of the majority of Christians, who he claimed agreed with his interpretation of John 6:44 and rejected Calvinism as a false doctrine.
  • Red herring: He changed the topic several times to avoid addressing White’s arguments, bringing up irrelevant issues such as the origin of Calvinism, the problem of evil, and the nature of love.

White, who argued that God unconditionally elects some individuals for salvation and others for reprobation before they are born, and that he irresistibly draws them to himself, also used various fallacies and devices, such as:

  • Generalization: He made sweeping statements and conclusions based on insufficient or questionable evidence, such as claiming that all non-Calvinists were inconsistent, illogical, and unbiblical.
  • Ad hominem: He attacked Flowers personally, rather than his arguments, accusing him of being ignorant, arrogant, and deceptive, and questioning his credentials and motives.
  • Rhetorical device: He used rhetorical questions, analogies, and metaphors to illustrate and emphasize his points, often using emotional language and imagery to appeal to the audience’s feelings and imagination.
  • Begging the question: He assumed the truth of his own position without providing adequate support or justification, often citing his own books and articles as authoritative sources.

The debate ended with no clear winner, as both sides failed to address the main issue and resorted to fallacious and rhetorical tactics. Each side declared themselves the victor and the defender of the truth, while denouncing the other as the loser and the enemy of the gospel. The moderator thanked them for their participation and announced that the next debate would be on the topic of predestination and free will, hoping that it would be more productive and civil. The audience left the venue, either satisfied or disappointed, depending on their prior beliefs and preferences.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Piper Rebukes Driscoll, Defends Stripper Sword-Swallower

Piper Defends Male Strippers from Driscoll, Says Faith is "Erotic to the Core" MINNEAPOLIS, MN - In a surprising turn of events, prominent evangelical leader John Piper has come out in defense of male strippers, arguing that their profession is a valid expression of Christian spirituality. The controversy began when fellow pastor Mark Driscoll condemned male strippers as "ungodly" and "a threat to the moral fabric of society." Driscoll's comments sparked outrage among some in the Christian community, including Piper, who quickly rushed to the defense of the much-maligned exotic dancers. "Mark Driscoll clearly has a very narrow and repressed view of human sexuality," Piper told reporters. "As I've said many times, the Christian faith is erotic to the core. God created us as sexual beings, and that includes the male stripper." Piper went on to cite the "Song of Songs" as biblical evidence that God delights in human sensu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Opinion: How to Win Any Theological Argument With One Simple Phrase

The Ultimate Guide to Dispensational Defense: How to Defend Your Faith and Confuse Your Critics Quickly and Efficiently Are you tired of losing arguments with your fellow Christians over eschatology, hermeneutics, or covenant theology? Do you wish you had a foolproof way to silence your opponents and prove your superior understanding of the Bible? Well, look no further than this one simple phrase: "You don't understand dispensationalism." That's right, with this magic phrase, you can win any theological debate in seconds. Here's how it works: - Step 1: Identify your opponent's position and label it as non-dispensational. It doesn't matter if they are amillennial, postmillennial, covenantal, or even dispensational themselves. Just say they are not. - Step 2: Assert that their position is based on a faulty interpretation of Scripture that ignores the literal, grammatical-historical method and the distinction between Israel and the church. - Step 3: When they...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pious Piper's Passionate Pivot: Launches O***F*** for 'Divine Desires' After 'Erotic' Jesus Revelation

Controversy Erupts as John Piper's Spiritual Sensuality Takes Center Stage on Unconventional Platform In a surprising turn of events, renowned Christian figure John Piper has reportedly ventured into uncharted territory by launching his own O***F*** [full name censored] page. This unexpected move comes hot on the heels of Piper's latest controversial statement where he likened his love for Jesus to something "erotic." Here’s the full quote: “…  that love, that love is not equal to obedience and that love is not equal to agape,  that love is erotic to the core . That’s an overstatement. Eros means I find pleasure in you, Jesus. I find pleasure in you, Jesus.” Piper's account, aptly named "DivineDesires," promises exclusive content that delves into the intimate and sensual aspects of his spiritual connection with Jesus. Subscribers to his page are treated to a series of videos where Piper engages in seemingly ordinary activities, but with a twist that sugg...
Post a Comment
Read more