Man confirms he has reached zero people, served zero meals, and completed zero acts of mercy—but has issued 417 urgent statements about everyone else’s tone.
ANYTOWN, USA — Local Christian commentator Derek Pruitt spent another productive afternoon this week reviewing the public ministries of people who are preaching, serving, creating, organizing, giving, and occasionally making mistakes in full view of the internet.
Pruitt, who describes himself as “a watchman on the wall,” has not personally identified which wall, what danger is approaching, or why the watchman has a gaming chair and a ring light. He says his chief burden is protecting the church from anyone who appears too earnest, too humorous, too public, too imperfect, or insufficiently aware that he has concerns.
“Some people think the Great Commission is about going,” Pruitt said, refreshing his notifications. “But the real calling is making sure those who go do not embarrass the cause of Christ by using a thumbnail font I dislike.”
Friends say Pruitt’s ministry has become more refined over time. Early in his Christian life, he merely commented “yikes” beneath outreach videos. He now produces full-length discernment threads, complete with screenshots, arrows, rhetorical questions, and a final paragraph explaining that he is “not trying to be divisive.”
His field report for the past year lists the following accomplishments:
• Souls reached: 0
• Hungry people fed: 0
• Prisoners visited: 0
• Widows and orphans assisted: 0
• Gospel conversations initiated: 0
• Satire posts denounced for “not being funny”: 63
• Times he announced he was “just asking questions”: 214
• Public servants informed they were doing ministry wrong: too many to calculate
“When other believers are actually doing something, there are risks,” Pruitt explained. “They could make a mistake. They could speak awkwardly. They could be misunderstood. They could even use satire to draw attention to serious issues in a way I personally would not have chosen.”
Pruitt said this final danger is especially alarming.
“Satire pages are tasteless,” he said. “They are not funny, because I do not find them funny. More importantly, they may cause people to notice serious moral and cultural problems through a format I did not approve beforehand.”
When asked whether he had considered that satire might be a way to expose hypocrisy, sharpen a moral contrast, or make people think about matters they would otherwise ignore, Pruitt replied that the issue was not whether anyone had been helped, persuaded, challenged, or awakened.
“The issue is whether I found the joke sufficiently restrained,” he said.
Pruitt’s pastor reportedly encouraged him to consider serving in the church’s mercy ministry, joining neighborhood outreach, helping with children’s programs, visiting shut-ins, or assisting with the monthly food distribution. Pruitt said he would love to help, but feared it would compromise his calling to identify deficiencies in the people already helping.
“Someone has to maintain standards,” he said. “If everyone got their hands dirty serving actual people, who would be left to explain why the soup kitchen’s Instagram caption was theologically imprecise?”
Church members say Pruitt has developed a detailed theology of participation in which he bears no responsibility for the difficult work, but receives full authority to critique its execution.
“He has a spiritual gift for standing at the edge of a construction site and explaining that the workers’ helmets are too flashy,” said one church member. “He has never lifted a board, but he has concerns about the framing.”
At press time, Pruitt was drafting a 2,800-word post titled Why Your Imperfect Attempt To Serve God Is Actually Damaging The Church, while declining an invitation to help unload groceries for elderly church members because he had “a very important thread to finish.”
Comments
Post a Comment